Financial Comparison: Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) & KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR)

KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KKR & Co. Inc. and Golub Capital BDC”s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KKR & Co. Inc.	$19.46 billion	4.21	$2.37 billion	$3.14	29.05
Golub Capital BDC	$870.78 million	3.61	$376.65 million	$0.65	18.65

KKR & Co. Inc. has higher revenue and earnings than Golub Capital BDC. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KKR & Co. Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

KKR & Co. Inc. has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for KKR & Co. Inc. and Golub Capital BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KKR & Co. Inc.	0	4	17	0	2.81
Golub Capital BDC	0	2	4	1	2.86

KKR & Co. Inc. presently has a consensus target price of $124.21, indicating a potential upside of 36.15%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $13.90, indicating a potential upside of 14.69%. Given KKR & Co. Inc.’s higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe KKR & Co. Inc. is more favorable than Golub Capital BDC.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.3% of KKR & Co. Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of KKR & Co. Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares KKR & Co. Inc. and Golub Capital BDC’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KKR & Co. Inc.	14.41%	5.88%	1.07%
Golub Capital BDC	21.45%	9.91%	4.39%

Dividends

KKR & Co. Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. KKR & Co. Inc. pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 203.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. KKR & Co. Inc. has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Summary

KKR & Co. Inc. beats Golub Capital BDC on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

About KKR & Co. Inc.

KKR & Co., Inc. operates as an investment firm. It offers alternative asset management as well as capital markets and insurance solutions. The firm’s business segments include Asset Management and Insurance Business. The Asset Management segment engages in providing private equity, real assets, credit and liquid strategies, capital markets, and principal activities. The Insurance Business segment offers retirement, life insurance and reinsurance solutions to clients across individual and institutional markets. The company was founded by Henry Kravis, George R. Roberts, and Jerome Kholberg on May 1, 1976 and is headquartered in New York, NY.

About Golub Capital BDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company. It invests in debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. It typically invests in diversified consumer services, automobiles, healthcare technology, insurance, health care equipment and supplies, hotels, restaurants and leisure, healthcare providers and services, IT services and specialty retails. It seeks to invest in the United States. It primarily invests in first lien traditional senior debt, first lien one stop, junior debt and equity, senior secured, one stop, unitranche, second lien, subordinated and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, and warrants.